Showing posts with label A-ONE`S BLOG. Show all posts
Showing posts with label A-ONE`S BLOG. Show all posts

Wednesday, 24 February 2016

Cameron says he's battling for Britain with EU but we say: You CAN'T win Prime Minister

says he's battling for Britain with EU but we say: You CAN'T win Prime Minister

TODAY the Daily Express demands that David Cameron puts his personal love affair with Europe to one side and is honest with the people of Britain.


David CameronGETTY
David Cameron needs to be honest with the people of Britain
If he has secured a deal with the EU he must admit that it is not a victory but a pitiful surrender.
If Cameron then proclaims he has triumphed for Britain it will be as meaningless as the infamous piece of paper Neville Chamberlain waved in 1938 which promised peace but ended in catastrophe.
When the Prime Minister entered the EU summit yesterday he declared boldly: “I’ll be battling for Britain.”
Except he wasn’t, because every European leader knew Cameron’s heart was not in this fight.
Cameron with European leadersGETTY
A deal with the EU is not a victory but a pitiful surrender
He had deliberately asked for little and did not care if he had to accept less because for all his strengths Cameron had one weakness: his deeply-held desire to ensure Britain remained part of the EU.
Last May he cleverly rode the tide of disillusion and resentment with the EU, which saw more than four million voters back Ukip, by brazenly pledging he would battle for “fundamental reform”.
He knew he could never deliver on that promise because no British leader – not Winston Churchill, not Margaret Thatcher – would be capable of stopping an EU dictatorship which is hell-bent on creating a United States of Europe regardless of the wishes of its citizens.
The only way is out.
Cameron has taken his begging bowl around the capitals of Europe, filled with the thinnest of gruel, only to have it tipped over his head in Brussels, where the real power lies.
Even if he were to get everything he was asking for it would not make a scrap of difference to the number of migrants flooding in and bursting our National Health Service and our schools at the seams.
It would not enable Britain to block one single unwanted EU law.
Nor would it let our courts have the final say on crucial matters such as whether terrorist have human rights.
David CameronGETTY
Cameron has a deeply-held desire to ensure Britain remains part of the EU
If the Prime Minister trumpets a deal today it must be treated with grave suspicion.
There will be no cast-iron guarantees, no treaty changes, nothing to stop the EU reneging on its word.
David CameronGETTY
Mr Cameron deliberately asked for little and did not care if he had to accept less
The EU referendum will be the most important vote this country has ever faced yet we will be expected to decide our future on the strength of “ifs and maybes”.
The Prime Minister must do his duty to the nation or history may condemn him as the man who sold us out.

Thursday, 14 January 2016

Obama Receives Formal Petition against Buhari for Disregard of Court Orders

2702F02.Barack-Obama.jpg - 2702F02.Barack-Obama.jpg
United States President, Mr. Barack Obama,

Petition garnered over 4,000 signatories, 47,000 views
Senator Iroegbu in AbujaĆ¢€¨
United States President, Mr. Barack Obama, has been formally presented with over 4,000 signatory petition, calling on President Muhammadu Buhari to respect court orders, uphold the constitution of Nigeria or resign from office.

The petition, which is being championed by a Legal Practitioner, Constitutional and Human Rights Lawyer, Ms. Carol Ajie, was sent to Obama on Monday, urging him to bear his influence on Buhari to respect the rule of law.

Ajie had in the petition which was  launch on the new year eve through the popular petition site Change.org, with over 4,000 signatories and 47,000 views,  also urged the Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), lawyers, legislators, National Judicial Council (NJC) and benchers, among others, to “call on President Buhari to resign from office for his disobedience to court orders.”

The concerned lawyer with the support of other members of the judicial arm of the government, including the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), asserted that Buhari, by his statements during the Presidential Media Chat at the State House in Abuja, was behind the flagrant disobedience to court orders.

Through the petition, Ajie made what she described as a clarion call on President Obama and other concerned stakeholders to “respectfully call President Buhari to order, prohibit violence from politics and rights advocacy campaigns, ask President Buhari to respect court orders or resign, support Nigeria and Nigerians to achieve true federalism or support the path to a confederation of independent states in Nigeria.”

She listed some factors in the current administration  which necessitated the petition including “sectional tension,  deliberate acts of inhumanity and dehumanisation, gender injustice, presidential profligacy and budget 2016 and disobedience of court orders.”

She said: “President Buhari’s unfair tactics, expression of prejudices and hostility towards the people commonly known as ‘Biafrans’ in the South-eastern region of Nigeria, is a bad precedent against our peaceful co-existence. The gravamen of his complaint is that the Igbos did not vote for him in March 2015. His supporters now tag the South-east derogatorily as ‘Biafraud.’  Elected as President, he must be magnanimous in victory.

“President Buhari was quoted as saying those who didn’t vote for him will be punished and sadly demonstrated this in a modern society.”
Ajie in the petition, also accused the president of deliberate acts of inhumanity and dehumanisation, especially against the Shiites and Biafran agitators, liking his treatment of these two groups to what led to the 1994 Rwanda genocide.

The human rights activist accused President Buhari of gender injustice, saying: “For obscure reasons, President Buhari ceded only 15 per cent to women in his cabinet, without remorse or apologies. Hence must be held to keep this and his other campaign promises and pledges, please.”

China is the biggest online spender in APAC: PayPal report

According to the report, the US is the top online shopping destination for APAC consumers, followed by China, the UK and Japan

 Online shopping

PayPal, in collaboration with global research company Ipsos, has released its second annual global report detailing online consumer trends in the Asia Pacific region.
Overall, consumers in Australia, China, India, Japan, Singapore and South Korea spent an estimated total of US$594 billion on online shopping in 2015, the report said. It also said that by 2017, India is expected to experience the fastest growth in e-commerce spending, at 53 per cent, followed by China (28 per cent) and Singapore (16 per cent).
It also saw a sharp increase in APAC participation in cross border e-commerce transactions. Singapore has the most online shoppers per capita, with 69 per cent of online shoppers making purchases domestically and overseas.

Unsurprisingly, China, with its increasingly affluent population, is also seeing a strong growth in cross-border transactions, with an increase of 9 per cent from 2014 to 2015. It also came in second in overall online spending in APAC.
The US emerged as the top online shopping destinations for APAC, with 68 per cent of respondents saying that they prefer to buy from leading e-commerce giant Amazon. However, China, the home ground of e-commerce giants Alibaba and Taobao, is also a popular choice, followed by the UK and Japan.

Fashion is hottest category

According to the report, 53 per cent of cross-border shoppers in APAC in 2015 purchased fashion items such as clothing, accessories and footwear.
Consumers are also increasingly using e-commerce sites to fulfill basic needs, with groceries emerging as one of the top growth categories for online shopping in APAC.

In Singapore, online shopping in the groceries industry is expected to grow by 21 per cent in 2016. Children’s supplies and household goods will follow closely with expected growth rates of 17 per cent and 16 per cent respectively in Singapore.

Wednesday, 13 January 2016

Nnamdi Kanu’s Case Assigned To New Judge, Hon. Justice John Tsoho.

Nnamdi in court with family inside court 03 
The case of pro-Biafran leader Nnamdi Kanu has been assigned to another judge, his lawyer told IBTimes UK. Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofo explained the case will be now presented before Hon Justice John Tsoho of the Federal High Court in Maitama, Abuja.
“The case is now slated for arraignment and hearing of our pending application for his bail on 18 January 2016,” he said. “The motion for his bail was today, 13 January, served on the attorney general of the federation. They are yet to file any counter to the application. I and the defence team will now be leading the case.”
ALSO READ: Nnamdi Kanu Set To Defeat Buhari Once More In Abuja High Court On 18th January 2016.
Kanu is the director of Radio Biafra and leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (Ipob). He was arrested by the State Security Service (DSS) in Lagos in October 2015 on conspiracy and terrorism charges that were later dropped.
However, a day after the Abuja High Court ruled he should be released, officials pressed new treasonable felony charges against him and two other defendants, Benjamin Madubugwu and David Nwawuisi. And President Muhammadu Buhari stirred outrage after stating Kanu will not be freed in spite of the High Court rulings in favour of his release due to the “atrocities” allegedly committed.
ALSO READ: USA Court Case: Biafra Is Battle Ready Against Nigeria In United State Court.
Kanu’s prolonged detention has caused the outrage of his supporters, who alleged he is being tortured. Ejiofo said: “These allegations of torture cannot be established until we are able to see him.” He added that his team wrote a letter to the director general of the DSS asking for permission to see their client.
“They are yet to respond,” he said. “In the unlikely event that we won’t be able to see him before, we are going to see him in court on 18 January.”
ALSO READ: IPOB Take Buhari To International Criminal Court (ICC) Over Human Right Abuses.
Pro-Biafrans have been holding rallies across south-eastern Nigeria calling for Kanu’s unconditional release and the independence of the Biafran territories forcibly annexed to modern-day Nigeria during the British colonisation.

Has Robert Mugabe had a heart attack? Rumours spread about Zimbabwe president’s health

  Has Robert Mugabe had a heart attack?

mugabe fallA letter to a Zimbabwean news website has suggested that the country’s president Robert Mugabe has suffered a heart attack Metro UK is reporting.
The letter suggests the 91-year-old was on holiday with his family when he fell ill and saying that it was unlikely that he would survive.
Metro.co.uk has contacted the Zimbabwean embassy to find out whether there is any truth in the rumours and there have previously been hoaxes about Mugabe’s death.

The letter published on ZimEye yesterday said: ‘President Robert Mugabe is reported to have collapsed after suffering a heart attack while on holiday with his family and is in critical condition.’
It continued that ‘sources close to the president are said to be holding high-level meetings as it is believed that he won’t be able to recover.’
The letter suggests Mugabe and his family have been flown out of the country and extra troops are to be deployed in the capital, Harare.

WE’VE TRIED ALL MANNER OF TORTURING TACTICS ON HIM, HE KEEPS SAYING ‘BIAFRA OR KILL ME’ – Musa Nasir DSS OFFICIAL

WE’VE TRIED ALL MANNER OF TORTURING TACTICS ON HIM, HE KEEPS SAYING ‘BIAFRA OR KILL ME’ – Musa Nasir DSS OFFICIAL

In my 11 years in security service in Nigeria, I
have never come across anyone as stubborn as
this Nnamdi Kanu says Musa Nasir a senior DSS
official.

We have tried all manner of torturing
tactics on him and all he keep saying that he
needed “BIAFRA OR KILL ME” even when he was
at point of death, he still maintained BIAFRA.
Nigeria have promised him everything on this
earth for him to forget Biafra but he refused. I
am a Muslim and I practice the teachings of
prophet Mohamed which commanded us not to
waste the blood of innocent, I can not continue
seeing this man being tortured, abused, harassed
and humiliated every day.
Three weeks ago our boss took away blanket and
pillow which he normally use to sleep now he
sleeps on a bear floor.


I can’t wait to leave this job, this is not right.
Disclosed DSS INSIDER.
# FREE NNAMDI KANU
\

American tourist gang-raped, fingers chopped in Papua New Guinea

An American woman hiking in Papua New Guinea with her London-based boyfriend was gang-raped and three of her fingers slashed in a brutal attack along a famous World War II trail, a report said Wednesday.

PNG police said the pair, both aged 31, were on the Kokoda Track which runs through the jungles of the island state off Australia’s northeastern tip when they were attacked and stripped of their belongings including mobile phones, shoes, backpacks and 15,000 kina (US$5,000) in cash.
“Two expatriate tourists, a male and a female, both 31, were trekking the Kokoda Track and heading towards Templeton Two (a campsite) when they were ambushed by armed men,” local assistant Police Commissioner Sylvester Kalaut told The National newspaper of the Monday ambush.
“The male trekker was tied to a tree and the female tracker was repeatedly raped before three of her fingers were chopped. The incident took place for an hour before they (trekkers) were set free.”
Police described the attack as a gang-rape and told the newspaper at least two suspects carrying bush knives and spears were involved. One of them was being held by villagers, The National added, which identified the tourists as American and London-based.
The couple fled to a village and were taken to the lawless Pacific island’s capital Port Moresby, where they were given medical attention.
Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs confirmed the attack and added that the couple were hiking without a licensed tour operator.
There are endemic levels of domestic violence against women in the Pacific region, with a 2013 United Nations study finding that 80 percent of men surveyed in PNG reported physically or sexually abusing their partners.
Two years ago, a US academic was gang-raped by an armed mob in the country while conducting research on birds and the impact of climate change in a remote forest on Karkar Island in Madang province.
In the same year, a group of eight Australian and New Zealand trekkers were violently attacked by bandits, with three of their porters killed, while hiking on the remote Black Cat track.
Four of the eight tourists were also hurt, including one who was speared in the leg.

When politicians insult Muslims … by Obama

President Barack Obama told Americans nervous about terror and a changing economy that they should not fear the future, in a farewell State of the Union address Tuesday that drew sharp contrast with Republicans.

In a primetime address that bubbled with 2016 election politics, Obama assailed Republicans for talking up the threat posed by the Islamic State group and talking down the American economy.
A self-assured and optimistic Obama cast himself as the foil of foes who warn the country is going in the wrong direction because of his seven years in office.
Hailing an epoch of “extraordinary change” laden with risk and opportunity, Obama called for a new “moonshot” to cure cancer, a shift away from dirty energy to power the world’s biggest economy and for a thaw in the last remnants of the Cold War by ending the embargo on Cuba.
Obama insisted “America has been through big changes before,” as he took thinly veiled shots at Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and other leading Republican presidential candidates.
“Each time, there have been those who told us to fear the future, who claimed we could slam the brakes on change, promising to restore past glory if we just got some group or idea that was threatening America under control. And each time, we overcame those fears.”
With less than three weeks until the Iowa caucuses — the first votes cast in the process to replace him — Obama berated Republican economic rhetoric, saying “anyone claiming that America’s economy is in decline is peddling fiction.”
But some of his toughest words were for Republican statements over the rise of the Islamic State group.
He painted the jihadists as “masses of fighters on the back of pickup trucks, twisted souls plotting in apartments or garages.”
He admitted that the extremists, who have overrun large areas of Syria and Iraq, pose an “enormous danger,” but made clear: “They do not threaten our national existence.”
“Our answer needs to be more than tough talk or calls to carpet-bomb civilians. That may work as a TV sound bite, but it doesn’t pass muster on the world’s stage,” he said pointedly.
“Over-the-top claims that this is World War III just play into their hands.”
And in a volley clearly aimed at Trump, Obama warned that “when politicians insult Muslims… that’s not telling it like it is. It’s just wrong. It diminishes us in the eyes of the world.”
The Republican frontrunner Trump was not impressed, describing the speech on Twitter as “really boring, slow, lethargic – very hard to watch!”
– Last chance? –
Tuesday’s address was arguably Obama’s last big opportunity to sway a national audience and frame the 2016 White House race.
Around 30 million viewers were expected to watch live, a nationwide audience that may only be matched in political terms during the Democratic nominating convention later this year.
But it risked being overshadowed by news that 10 US Navy personnel had been taken to an Iranian naval base in the Gulf.
Senior US officials said they had received assurances the crews would sail onwards come first light, but Republicans held up the crisis up as evidence that Obama was naive to engage Tehran.
Overall, it was an unorthodox speech that eschewed the typical laundry list of legislative priorities as Obama tried to lift the country’s gaze beyond the next year, and beyond his presidency.
But he also tacitly, and explicitly, admitted mistakes.
There was no mention of the racial tensions that have dogged the tenure of the first black president.
There was only a fleeting reference, and a symbolic empty seat in the chamber, to gun control and the awful toll of American gun violence.
– ‘Angriest voices’ –
Obama did take some blame for Washington’s hyperpartisan politics.
“It’s one of the few regrets of my presidency  —  that the rancor and suspicion between the parties has gotten worse instead of better,” he said in a moment of personal candor.
“There’s no doubt a president with the gifts of Lincoln or Roosevelt might have better bridged the divide, and I guarantee I’ll keep trying to be better so long as I hold this office.”
South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley said in the traditional Republican rebuttal of Obama’s address that “the president’s record has often fallen far short of his soaring words.”
“As he enters his final year in office, many Americans are still feeling the squeeze of an economy too weak to raise income levels.”
She also cited “chaotic unrest in many of our cities” and “the most dangerous terrorist threat our nation has seen since September 11.”
But Haley, the daughter of Indian immigrants, also jabbed at Trump over his views on immigration.
“During anxious times, it can be tempting to follow the siren call of the angriest voices,” she said.
“We must resist that temptation. No one who is willing to work hard, abide by our laws, and love our traditions should ever feel unwelcome in this country.” 

President Obama’s Full and Final State of the Union Speech

Obama final State of the Union address Africa Business Worlf
.
This is a full transcript of the speech delivered by President Barack Obama to the Joint Assembly of the US Congress on Jan 12, 2016
Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, my fellow Americans:
Tonight marks the eighth year I’ve come here to report on the State of the Union. And for this final one, I’m going to try to make it shorter. I know some of you are antsy to get back to Iowa.
I also understand that because it’s an election season, expectations for what we’ll achieve this year are low. Still, Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the constructive approach you and the other leaders took at the end of last year to pass a budget and make tax cuts permanent for working families. So I hope we can work together this year on bipartisan priorities like criminal justice reform, and helping people who are battling prescription drug abuse. We just might surprise the cynics again.
But tonight, I want to go easy on the traditional list of proposals for the year ahead. Don’t worry, I’ve got plenty, from helping students learn to write computer code to personalizing medical treatments for patients. And I’ll keep pushing for progress on the work that still needs doing. Fixing a broken immigration system. Protecting our kids from gun violence. Equal pay for equal work, paid leave, raising the minimum wage. All these things still matter to hardworking families; they are still the right thing to do; and I will not let up until they get done.
But for my final address to this chamber, I don’t want to talk just about the next year. I want to focus on the next five years, ten years, and beyond.
I want to focus on our future.
We live in a time of extraordinary change — change that’s reshaping the way we live, the way we work, our planet and our place in the world. It’s change that promises amazing medical breakthroughs, but also economic disruptions that strain working families. It promises education for girls in the most remote villages, but also connects terrorists plotting an ocean away. It’s change that can broaden opportunity, or widen inequality. And whether we like it or not, the pace of this change will only accelerate.
America has been through big changes before — wars and depression, the influx of immigrants, workers fighting for a fair deal, and movements to expand civil rights. Each time, there have been those who told us to fear the future; who claimed we could slam the brakes on change, promising to restore past glory if we just got some group or idea that was threatening America under control. And each time, we overcame those fears. We did not, in the words of Lincoln, adhere to the “dogmas of the quiet past.” Instead we thought anew, and acted anew. We made change work for us, always extending America’s promise outward, to the next frontier, to more and more people. And because we did — because we saw opportunity where others saw only peril — we emerged stronger and better than before.
What was true then can be true now. Our unique strengths as a nation — our optimism and work ethic, our spirit of discovery and innovation, our diversity and commitment to the rule of law — these things give us everything we need to ensure prosperity and security for generations to come.
In fact, it’s that spirit that made the progress of these past seven years possible. It’s how we recovered from the worst economic crisis in generations. It’s how we reformed our health care system, and reinvented our energy sector; how we delivered more care and benefits to our troops and veterans, and how we secured the freedom in every state to marry the person we love.
But such progress is not inevitable. It is the result of choices we make together. And we face such choices right now. Will we respond to the changes of our time with fear, turning inward as a nation, and turning against each other as a people? Or will we face the future with confidence in who we are, what we stand for, and the incredible things we can do together?
So let’s talk about the future, and four big questions that we as a country have to answer — regardless of who the next President is, or who controls the next Congress.

First, how do we give everyone a fair shot at opportunity and security in this new economy?

Second, how do we make technology work for us, and not against us — especially when it comes to solving urgent challenges like climate change?

Third, how do we keep America safe and lead the world without becoming its policeman?

And finally, how can we make our politics reflect what’s best in us, and not what’s worst?

Let me start with the economy, and a basic fact: the United States of America, right now, has the strongest, most durable economy in the world. We’re in the middle of the longest streak of private-sector job creation in history. More than 14 million new jobs; the strongest two years of job growth since the ’90s; an unemployment rate cut in half. Our auto industry just had its best year ever. Manufacturing has created nearly 900,000 new jobs in the past six years. And we’ve done all this while cutting our deficits by almost three-quarters.
Anyone claiming that America’s economy is in decline is peddling fiction. What is true — and the reason that a lot of Americans feel anxious — is that the economy has been changing in profound ways, changes that started long before the Great Recession hit and haven’t let up. Today, technology doesn’t just replace jobs on the assembly line, but any job where work can be automated. Companies in a global economy can locate anywhere, and face tougher competition. As a result, workers have less leverage for a raise. Companies have less loyalty to their communities. And more and more wealth and income is concentrated at the very top.
All these trends have squeezed workers, even when they have jobs; even when the economy is growing. It’s made it harder for a hardworking family to pull itself out of poverty, harder for young people to start on their careers, and tougher for workers to retire when they want to. And although none of these trends are unique to America, they do offend our uniquely American belief that everybody who works hard should get a fair shot.
For the past seven years, our goal has been a growing economy that works better for everybody. We’ve made progress. But we need to make more. And despite all the political arguments we’ve had these past few years, there are some areas where Americans broadly agree.
We agree that real opportunity requires every American to get the education and training they need to land a good-paying job. The bipartisan reform of No Child Left Behind was an important start, and together, we’ve increased early childhood education, lifted high school graduation rates to new highs, and boosted graduates in fields like engineering. In the coming years, we should build on that progress, by providing Pre-K for all, offering every student the hands-on computer science and math classes that make them job-ready on day one, and we should recruit and support more great teachers for our kids.
And we have to make college affordable for every American. Because no hardworking student should be stuck in the red. We’ve already reduced student loan payments to ten percent of a borrower’s income. Now, we’ve actually got to cut the cost of college. Providing two years of community college at no cost for every responsible student is one of the best ways to do that, and I’m going to keep fighting to get that started this year.
Of course, a great education isn’t all we need in this new economy. We also need benefits and protections that provide a basic measure of security. After all, it’s not much of a stretch to say that some of the only people in America who are going to work the same job, in the same place, with a health and retirement package, for 30 years, are sitting in this chamber. For everyone else, especially folks in their forties and fifties, saving for retirement or bouncing back from job loss has gotten a lot tougher. Americans understand that at some point in their careers, they may have to retool and retrain. But they shouldn’t lose what they’ve already worked so hard to build.
That’s why Social Security and Medicare are more important than ever; we shouldn’t weaken them, we should strengthen them. And for Americans short of retirement, basic benefits should be just as mobile as everything else is today. That’s what the Affordable Care Act is all about. It’s about filling the gaps in employer-based care so that when we lose a job, or go back to school, or start that new business, we’ll still have coverage. Nearly eighteen million have gained coverage so far. Health care inflation has slowed. And our businesses have created jobs every single month since it became law.
Now, I’m guessing we won’t agree on health care anytime soon. But there should be other ways both parties can improve economic security. Say a hardworking American loses his job — we shouldn’t just make sure he can get unemployment insurance; we should make sure that program encourages him to retrain for a business that’s ready to hire him. If that new job doesn’t pay as much, there should be a system of wage insurance in place so that he can still pay his bills. And even if he’s going from job to job, he should still be able to save for retirement and take his savings with him. That’s the way we make the new economy work better for everyone.
I also know Speaker Ryan has talked about his interest in tackling poverty. America is about giving everybody willing to work a hand up, and I’d welcome a serious discussion about strategies we can all support, like expanding tax cuts for low-income workers without kids.
But there are other areas where it’s been more difficult to find agreement over the last seven years — namely what role the government should play in making sure the system’s not rigged in favor of the wealthiest and biggest corporations. And here, the American people have a choice to make.
I believe a thriving private sector is the lifeblood of our economy. I think there are outdated regulations that need to be changed, and there’s red tape that needs to be cut. But after years of record corporate profits, working families won’t get more opportunity or bigger paychecks by letting big banks or big oil or hedge funds make their own rules at the expense of everyone else; or by allowing attacks on collective bargaining to go unanswered. Food Stamp recipients didn’t cause the financial crisis; recklessness on Wall Street did. Immigrants aren’t the reason wages haven’t gone up enough; those decisions are made in the boardrooms that too often put quarterly earnings over long-term returns. It’s sure not the average family watching tonight that avoids paying taxes through offshore accounts. In this new economy, workers and start-ups and small businesses need more of a voice, not less. The rules should work for them. And this year I plan to lift up the many businesses who’ve figured out that doing right by their workers ends up being good for their shareholders, their customers, and their communities, so that we can spread those best practices across America.
In fact, many of our best corporate citizens are also our most creative. This brings me to the second big question we have to answer as a country: how do we reignite that spirit of innovation to meet our biggest challenges?
Sixty years ago, when the Russians beat us into space, we didn’t deny Sputnik was up there. We didn’t argue about the science, or shrink our research and development budget. We built a space program almost overnight, and twelve years later, we were walking on the moon.
That spirit of discovery is in our DNA. We’re Thomas Edison and the Wright Brothers and George Washington Carver. We’re Grace Hopper and Katherine Johnson and Sally Ride. We’re every immigrant and entrepreneur from Boston to Austin to Silicon Valley racing to shape a better world. And over the past seven years, we’ve nurtured that spirit.
We’ve protected an open internet, and taken bold new steps to get more students and low-income Americans online. We’ve launched next-generation manufacturing hubs, and online tools that give an entrepreneur everything he or she needs to start a business in a single day.
But we can do so much more. Last year, Vice President Biden said that with a new moonshot, America can cure cancer. Last month, he worked with this Congress to give scientists at the National Institutes of Health the strongest resources they’ve had in over a decade. Tonight, I’m announcing a new national effort to get it done. And because he’s gone to the mat for all of us, on so many issues over the past forty years, I’m putting Joe in charge of Mission Control. For the loved ones we’ve all lost, for the family we can still save, let’s make America the country that cures cancer once and for all.
Medical research is critical. We need the same level of commitment when it comes to developing clean energy sources.
Look, if anybody still wants to dispute the science around climate change, have at it. You’ll be pretty lonely, because you’ll be debating our military, most of America’s business leaders, the majority of the American people, almost the entire scientific community, and 200 nations around the world who agree it’s a problem and intend to solve it.
But even if the planet wasn’t at stake; even if 2014 wasn’t the warmest year on record — until 2015 turned out even hotter — why would we want to pass up the chance for American businesses to produce and sell the energy of the future?
Seven years ago, we made the single biggest investment in clean energy in our history. Here are the results. In fields from Iowa to Texas, wind power is now cheaper than dirtier, conventional power. On rooftops from Arizona to New York, solar is saving Americans tens of millions of dollars a year on their energy bills, and employs more Americans than coal — in jobs that pay better than average. We’re taking steps to give homeowners the freedom to generate and store their own energy — something environmentalists and Tea Partiers have teamed up to support. Meanwhile, we’ve cut our imports of foreign oil by nearly sixty percent, and cut carbon pollution more than any other country on Earth.
Gas under two bucks a gallon ain’t bad, either.
Now we’ve got to accelerate the transition away from dirty energy. Rather than subsidize the past, we should invest in the future — especially in communities that rely on fossil fuels. That’s why I’m going to push to change the way we manage our oil and coal resources, so that they better reflect the costs they impose on taxpayers and our planet. That way, we put money back into those communities and put tens of thousands of Americans to work building a 21st century transportation system.
None of this will happen overnight, and yes, there are plenty of entrenched interests who want to protect the status quo. But the jobs we’ll create, the money we’ll save, and the planet we’ll preserve — that’s the kind of future our kids and grandkids deserve.
Climate change is just one of many issues where our security is linked to the rest of the world. And that’s why the third big question we have to answer is how to keep America safe and strong without either isolating ourselves or trying to nation-build everywhere there’s a problem.
I told you earlier all the talk of America’s economic decline is political hot air. Well, so is all the rhetoric you hear about our enemies getting stronger and America getting weaker. The United States of America is the most powerful nation on Earth. Period. It’s not even close. We spend more on our military than the next eight nations combined. Our troops are the finest fighting force in the history of the world. No nation dares to attack us or our allies because they know that’s the path to ruin. Surveys show our standing around the world is higher than when I was elected to this office, and when it comes to every important international issue, people of the world do not look to Beijing or Moscow to lead — they call us.
As someone who begins every day with an intelligence briefing, I know this is a dangerous time. But that’s not because of diminished American strength or some looming superpower. In today’s world, we’re threatened less by evil empires and more by failing states. The Middle East is going through a transformation that will play out for a generation, rooted in conflicts that date back millennia. Economic headwinds blow from a Chinese economy in transition. Even as their economy contracts, Russia is pouring resources to prop up Ukraine and Syria — states they see slipping away from their orbit. And the international system we built after World War II is now struggling to keep pace with this new reality.
It’s up to us to help remake that system. And that means we have to set priorities.
Priority number one is protecting the American people and going after terrorist networks. Both al Qaeda and now ISIL pose a direct threat to our people, because in today’s world, even a handful of terrorists who place no value on human life, including their own, can do a lot of damage. They use the Internet to poison the minds of individuals inside our country; they undermine our allies.
But as we focus on destroying ISIL, over-the-top claims that this is World War III just play into their hands. Masses of fighters on the back of pickup trucks and twisted souls plotting in apartments or garages pose an enormous danger to civilians and must be stopped. But they do not threaten our national existence. That’s the story ISIL wants to tell; that’s the kind of propaganda they use to recruit. We don’t need to build them up to show that we’re serious, nor do we need to push away vital allies in this fight by echoing the lie that ISIL is representative of one of the world’s largest religions. We just need to call them what they are — killers and fanatics who have to be rooted out, hunted down, and destroyed.
That’s exactly what we are doing. For more than a year, America has led a coalition of more than 60 countries to cut off ISIL’s financing, disrupt their plots, stop the flow of terrorist fighters, and stamp out their vicious ideology. With nearly 10,000 air strikes, we are taking out their leadership, their oil, their training camps, and their weapons. We are training, arming, and supporting forces who are steadily reclaiming territory in Iraq and Syria.
If this Congress is serious about winning this war, and wants to send a message to our troops and the world, you should finally authorize the use of military force against ISIL. Take a vote. But the American people should know that with or without Congressional action, ISIL will learn the same lessons as terrorists before them. If you doubt America’s commitment — or mine — to see that justice is done, ask Osama bin Laden. Ask the leader of al Qaeda in Yemen, who was taken out last year, or the perpetrator of the Benghazi attacks, who sits in a prison cell. When you come after Americans, we go after you. It may take time, but we have long memories, and our reach has no limit.
Our foreign policy must be focused on the threat from ISIL and al Qaeda, but it can’t stop there. For even without ISIL, instability will continue for decades in many parts of the world — in the Middle East, in Afghanistan and Pakistan, in parts of Central America, Africa and Asia. Some of these places may become safe havens for new terrorist networks; others will fall victim to ethnic conflict, or famine, feeding the next wave of refugees. The world will look to us to help solve these problems, and our answer needs to be more than tough talk or calls to carpet bomb civilians. That may work as a TV sound bite, but it doesn’t pass muster on the world stage.
We also can’t try to take over and rebuild every country that falls into crisis. That’s not leadership; that’s a recipe for quagmire, spilling American blood and treasure that ultimately weakens us. It’s the lesson of Vietnam, of Iraq — and we should have learned it by now.
Fortunately, there’s a smarter approach, a patient and disciplined strategy that uses every element of our national power. It says America will always act, alone if necessary, to protect our people and our allies; but on issues of global concern, we will mobilize the world to work with us, and make sure other countries pull their own weight.
That’s our approach to conflicts like Syria, where we’re partnering with local forces and leading international efforts to help that broken society pursue a lasting peace.
That’s why we built a global coalition, with sanctions and principled diplomacy, to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. As we speak, Iran has rolled back its nuclear program, shipped out its uranium stockpile, and the world has avoided another war.
That’s how we stopped the spread of Ebola in West Africa. Our military, our doctors, and our development workers set up the platform that allowed other countries to join us in stamping out that epidemic.
That’s how we forged a Trans-Pacific Partnership to open markets, protect workers and the environment, and advance American leadership in Asia. It cuts 18,000 taxes on products Made in America, and supports more good jobs. With TPP, China doesn’t set the rules in that region, we do. You want to show our strength in this century? Approve this agreement. Give us the tools to enforce it.
Fifty years of isolating Cuba had failed to promote democracy, setting us back in Latin America. That’s why we restored diplomatic relations, opened the door to travel and commerce, and positioned ourselves to improve the lives of the Cuban people. You want to consolidate our leadership and credibility in the hemisphere? Recognize that the Cold War is over. Lift the embargo.
American leadership in the 21st century is not a choice between ignoring the rest of the world — except when we kill terrorists; or occupying and rebuilding whatever society is unraveling. Leadership means a wise application of military power, and rallying the world behind causes that are right. It means seeing our foreign assistance as part of our national security, not charity. When we lead nearly 200 nations to the most ambitious agreement in history to fight climate change — that helps vulnerable countries, but it also protects our children. When we help Ukraine defend its democracy, or Colombia resolve a decades-long war, that strengthens the international order we depend upon. When we help African countries feed their people and care for the sick, that prevents the next pandemic from reaching our shores. Right now, we are on track to end the scourge of HIV/AIDS, and we have the capacity to accomplish the same thing with malaria — something I’ll be pushing this Congress to fund this year.
That’s strength. That’s leadership. And that kind of leadership depends on the power of our example. That is why I will keep working to shut down the prison at Guantanamo: it’s expensive, it’s unnecessary, and it only serves as a recruitment brochure for our enemies.
That’s why we need to reject any politics that targets people because of race or religion. This isn’t a matter of political correctness. It’s a matter of understanding what makes us strong. The world respects us not just for our arsenal; it respects us for our diversity and our openness and the way we respect every faith. His Holiness, Pope Francis, told this body from the very spot I stand tonight that “to imitate the hatred and violence of tyrants and murderers is the best way to take their place.” When politicians insult Muslims, when a mosque is vandalized, or a kid bullied, that doesn’t make us safer. That’s not telling it like it is. It’s just wrong. It diminishes us in the eyes of the world. It makes it harder to achieve our goals. And it betrays who we are as a country.
“We the People.”
Our Constitution begins with those three simple words, words we’ve come to recognize mean all the people, not just some; words that insist we rise and fall together. That brings me to the fourth, and maybe the most important thing I want to say tonight.
The future we want — opportunity and security for our families; a rising standard of living and a sustainable, peaceful planet for our kids — all that is within our reach. But it will only happen if we work together. It will only happen if we can have rational, constructive debates.
It will only happen if we fix our politics.
A better politics doesn’t mean we have to agree on everything. This is a big country, with different regions and attitudes and interests. That’s one of our strengths, too. Our Founders distributed power between states and branches of government, and expected us to argue, just as they did, over the size and shape of government, over commerce and foreign relations, over the meaning of liberty and the imperatives of security.
But democracy does require basic bonds of trust between its citizens. It doesn’t work if we think the people who disagree with us are all motivated by malice, or that our political opponents are unpatriotic. Democracy grinds to a halt without a willingness to compromise; or when even basic facts are contested, and we listen only to those who agree with us. Our public life withers when only the most extreme voices get attention. Most of all, democracy breaks down when the average person feels their voice doesn’t matter; that the system is rigged in favor of the rich or the powerful or some narrow interest.
Too many Americans feel that way right now. It’s one of the few regrets of my presidency — that the rancor and suspicion between the parties has gotten worse instead of better. There’s no doubt a president with the gifts of Lincoln or Roosevelt might have better bridged the divide, and I guarantee I’ll keep trying to be better so long as I hold this office.
But, my fellow Americans, this cannot be my task — or any President’s — alone. There are a whole lot of folks in this chamber who would like to see more cooperation, a more elevated debate in Washington, but feel trapped by the demands of getting elected. I know; you’ve told me. And if we want a better politics, it’s not enough to just change a Congressman or a Senator or even a President; we have to change the system to reflect our better selves.
We have to end the practice of drawing our congressional districts so that politicians can pick their voters, and not the other way around. We have to reduce the influence of money in our politics, so that a handful of families and hidden interests can’t bankroll our elections — and if our existing approach to campaign finance can’t pass muster in the courts, we need to work together to find a real solution. We’ve got to make voting easier, not harder, and modernize it for the way we live now. And over the course of this year, I intend to travel the country to push for reforms that do.
But I can’t do these things on my own. Changes in our political process — in not just who gets elected but how they get elected — that will only happen when the American people demand it. It will depend on you. That’s what’s meant by a government of, by, and for the people.
What I’m asking for is hard. It’s easier to be cynical; to accept that change isn’t possible, and politics is hopeless, and to believe that our voices and actions don’t matter. But if we give up now, then we forsake a better future. Those with money and power will gain greater control over the decisions that could send a young soldier to war, or allow another economic disaster, or roll back the equal rights and voting rights that generations of Americans have fought, even died, to secure. As frustration grows, there will be voices urging us to fall back into tribes, to scapegoat fellow citizens who don’t look like us, or pray like us, or vote like we do, or share the same background.
We can’t afford to go down that path. It won’t deliver the economy we want, or the security we want, but most of all, it contradicts everything that makes us the envy of the world.
So, my fellow Americans, whatever you may believe, whether you prefer one party or no party, our collective future depends on your willingness to uphold your obligations as a citizen. To vote. To speak out. To stand up for others, especially the weak, especially the vulnerable, knowing that each of us is only here because somebody, somewhere, stood up for us. To stay active in our public life so it reflects the goodness and decency and optimism that I see in the American people every single day.
It won’t be easy. Our brand of democracy is hard. But I can promise that a year from now, when I no longer hold this office, I’ll be right there with you as a citizen — inspired by those voices of fairness and vision, of grit and good humor and kindness that have helped America travel so far. Voices that help us see ourselves not first and foremost as black or white or Asian or Latino, not as gay or straight, immigrant or native born; not as Democrats or Republicans, but as Americans first, bound by a common creed. Voices Dr. King believed would have the final word — voices of unarmed truth and unconditional love.
They’re out there, those voices. They don’t get a lot of attention, nor do they seek it, but they are busy doing the work this country needs doing.
I see them everywhere I travel in this incredible country of ours. I see you. I know you’re there. You’re the reason why I have such incredible confidence in our future. Because I see your quiet, sturdy citizenship all the time.
I see it in the worker on the assembly line who clocked extra shifts to keep his company open, and the boss who pays him higher wages to keep him on board.
I see it in the Dreamer who stays up late to finish her science project, and the teacher who comes in early because he knows she might someday cure a disease.
I see it in the American who served his time, and dreams of starting over — and the business owner who gives him that second chance. The protester determined to prove that justice matters, and the young cop walking the beat, treating everybody with respect, doing the brave, quiet work of keeping us safe.
I see it in the soldier who gives almost everything to save his brothers, the nurse who tends to him ’til he can run a marathon, and the community that lines up to cheer him on.
It’s the son who finds the courage to come out as who he is, and the father whose love for that son overrides everything he’s been taught.
I see it in the elderly woman who will wait in line to cast her vote as long as she has to; the new citizen who casts his for the first time; the volunteers at the polls who believe every vote should count, because each of them in different ways know how much that precious right is worth.
That’s the America I know. That’s the country we love. Clear-eyed. Big-hearted. Optimistic that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word. That’s what makes me so hopeful about our future. Because of you. I believe in you. That’s why I stand here confident that the State of our Union is strong.
Thank you, God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.

Monday, 11 January 2016

PLAN DEAL: UWAZURUIKE AND FG PLANNING A SIEGE ON BIAFRA


PLAN DEAL: UWAZURUIKE AND FG PLANNING A SIEGE ON BIAFRA
Article Written by Ifeanyi Chijioke
(For Family Writers) biafra herald

Recall the agreement between Chief Ralph Uwazuruike and Nigerian government, which categorically stated that he Uwazuruike must not do anything that will threaten Nigerian's unity. Caught in the act and was exposed of all his atrocities and frauds on the staunch people of Biafra; he entirely left freedom fighting and joined politics. Virtually in the last election, he mobilized gullible Massob members to protest for the removal of Jega which contradicted freedom fighting principles. In declaration of another faction by determined Uchenna Madu, Uwazuruike was cautioned to leave Biafra struggle as he has sabotaged the course on many occasions. He reluctantly left and formed a new group called BIM, unable to work-out any road map with BIM, he resorted to appointing stooges that he will manipulate.

ALSO READ: PLAN DEAL: Don't declare independence on February 20, 2016 -- Itse Sagay warns Ralph Uwazuruike 

There is credible information from our reliable source that Uwazuruike has perfected plans with federal government to throw Biafra land in turmoil. The grand plan is to put Biafra land under siege, where the tender genocide will fully take effect. According to our source who said " We were with Uwazuruike when he said he would conduct election, appoint INEC chairman and other things, we did not question him because he loves being the boss. I wonder where this election will happen, how he intends to declare Biafra and whose support or recognition. This same thing that happened with Biafra passport is happening again, previously it was for money, but now it is an orchestrated plan with Federal government to siege Biafra land" It is crucial to sound a note of warning to Uwazuruike that Biafrans will not take further wound from him, he has inflicted pains and killed a good number of us in complying with Nigeria. On the other hand, I call on all true Biafrans to disregard Uwazurike as he is enemy of Biafrans, he has nothing to offer for Biafra restoration if not crocodile-tears that will land us into hell.


The leader of Indigenous People of Biafra Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is in detention for the sake of Biafra, UK parliament will debate Biafra and I wonder why Uwazuruike will heartlessly choose to destroy everything we have built. Election and declaration without achieving Biafra is the greatest fraud of it all, he appears to be doing it for Biafra but he is working with Federal government to declare state of emergency in Biafra land and kill us. The leaders of Ijaw, Igbo, Igala, Itshekiri, Igbanke, and all parts of Biafra must warn Uwazuruike to desist from such devilish plan. Let Uchenna Madu quickly speak out in condemnation of this and also the members of Uwazuruike who he has appointed must see the deceit and stand up against evil.

Sunday, 10 January 2016

Israel appoints interior minister who served time for graft

Israel’s cabinet on Sunday approved the controversial appointment of the country’s new interior minister, an ultra-Orthodox party head who had served prison time for corruption.
Aryeh Deri takes over the post after his predecessor Silvan Shalom resigned last month following allegations of sexual harassment.
His Shas party is vital to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right-wing governing coalition, which holds a one-seat majority in parliament.
Deri, who had served as interior minister from 1988 to 1993, was  sentenced to three years in prison in 2000 for taking $155,000 in bribes, though his sentence was reduced by a third for good behaviour.
Deri resigned as economy minister in November after refusing to overrule anti-trust authorities’ objections to a major natural gas deal being pushed by Netanyahu.
His resignation allowed Netanyahu to take over the economy minister post himself and move ahead on the gas deal.
Following his resignation, Deri served as development minister for the Negev and Galilee regions.
Critics on Sunday said the interior ministry post should not be granted to someone convicted for corruption. Others argued that Deri, who is also a member of parliament, had paid his debt to society.
The interior ministry notably oversees local government and efforts to prevent illegal immigration. The police fall under a separate ministry. Vanguard news

Catalonia's leader-to-be calls for independence process to start


Catalan regional caretaker president Artur Mas (L) with Carles Puigdemont, who will be the candidate for the Catalan regional presidency
.
View photo
Catalan regional caretaker president Artur Mas (L) with Carles Puigdemont, who will be the candidate for the Catalan regional presidency (AFP Photo/Lluis Gene)
Barcelona (AFP) - Carles Puigdemont, the man who has been chosen to lead Catalonia to independence from Spain, called Sunday for the secession process to start in a speech to the wealthy region's parliament.
"We need... to start the process to set up an independent state in Catalonia," he said just hours before local lawmakers were expected to vote him in as new regional president.

Zimbabwe: Mujuru 'Grand' Strategy Revealed


FORMER vice-president Joice Mujuru is touring the country's provinces consulting grassroots ahead of the official launch of her People First (PF) party, amid revelations she is wooing experienced politicians from established parties.
According to close Mujuru allies, President Robert Mugabe's former long-time deputy was in the Midlands Province early last week where she met former legislators from both the ruling Zanu PF party and the opposition, in particular former Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai's MDC-T.
Images appeared on social media showing Mujuru in a group photo with ex-lawmakers, mainly from the opposition MDC-T.
PF interim spokesperson Rugare Gumbo confirmed Mujuru met with ex-MDC-T MPs.
"They are the ones who asked to meet her. I did not attend the meeting, but I understand they wanted to assure her that they were fully behind her," Gumbo said.
A picture taken after the meeting showed that more than 16 former MPs attended and these included ex-Chiredzi MP Moses Mare, former Mutare West MP and Manicaland provincial chairman Shuah Mudiwa, former Zaka North MP Enerst Mudavanhu and several others.
Mudiwa described the meeting as "just a free association."
He said PF was still to be launched and hence there was nothing to join at the moment.
"This is just an association. There is nothing to join because they are yet to form a party," Mudiwa said.
Other officials close to Mujuru said the PF project was taking shape.
"The train is ready to move. Things have shaped up. I used to tell you that things were shaping up but now they have shaped up. Just wait and see," said one of the key mobilisers.
"We have senior officials from other parties offering to pay for the halls we want to hold meetings where Mujuru will address. It is exciting."
Mujuru, according to sources, will be meeting activists from Bulawayo province this week before hosting other provinces.
She has already met with her party's structures in Masvingo, Harare and Manicaland as well as the political hotbed of Mashonaland East.
"She will be meeting the Bulawayo province soon. Her message is clear; the party is ready to roll. She is telling people that she is holding a political bottle that is full of promises. It is a mixture of people from across the divide," said another source.
"From the MDC and from Zanu PF, but her main thrust is to unite the people of this country.
"Mujuru has no option but to lead because she has the people's goodwill and the masses are convinced that is the only thing that can save this nation."
Mujuru's manoeuvres have sent shockwaves across the country's body-politic.
"It's positive chaos. She has rocked the very foundations of particularly the opposition. There is spontaneity; there is energy even as far as South Africa.
"The kind of energy that I did not see even at the height of the MDC's popularity in the early days of its formation," a senior MDC-T official said.
"The smaller parties like the People's Democratic Party (PDP) led by Tendai Biti will be swallowed even Simba Makoni's Mavambo/Kusile/Dawn. As for the MDC-T little will remain of it because most of its leaders in the provinces and those that were disgruntled are joining the PF enmasse".
Gumbo said Mujuru was about to wind up her nationwide tours.
"In fact we are almost done with all the provinces. There are I think one or two that remain as well as other groups such as former MPs and organisations keen on hearing her position and message," Gumbo said.
He said there "is palpable excitement" across the political divide with "MPs from both Zanu PF and the MDCs stampeding to join".
"There is massive excitement because people see this as the only institution that can save the country. The response Mai Mujuru has received is tremendous," he said.
But Zanu PF spokesperson Simon Khaya-Moyo scoffed at the reports that his party's members were ready to jump ship.
"I am not a spokesperson for anybody other than Zanu PF. I have not been advised by anybody that they want to leave the party," Khaya-Moyo said.
Khaya-Moyo refused to comment on suggestions that PF would take away Zanu PF supporters.
"I have no mandated to talk about other political groups and their activities," he said.
Gumbo said Mujuru's message to the provinces was that the launch of the long awaited party was near.
"She is telling them that we are close to the launch and that we have left Zanu PF for good," she said.
" There is no turning back. We are starting a movement that will be a political home for disenfranchised Zimbabweans from across the political divide. We want to bring people together."
He said the party had already coined a rallying slogan: "In PF we say; tiri tese (we are in it together). Rino igore rekuvaka (this is a year of reconstruction".
"Reconstruction of our politics because the institutions that Zanu has created are aimed at entrenching the status quo, that cements the power of the elite," Gumbo said.
"It is a narrow elite, that is supported by extractive institutions which they are using to suck resources to the detriment of all Zimbabweans."
Meanwhile, MDC-T spokesperson Obert Gutu said it was not true that his party was losing MPs to PF.
"It's a blue lie to allege that Joice Mujuru is attracting support from MDC-T structures," he said.
" Last time I checked, it is supporters of Tendai Biti's PDP who had joined Mujuru if recent reports on social media are anything to go by.
"The MDC - T remains the largest and most popular political party in Zimbabwe.
"We're the real deal; the only game in town. Joice Mujuru might be a threat to the faction-ridden and crumbling Zanu PF and other small, fringe opposition political parties but certainly, she is not a threat to the MDC - T. In a free and fair election in Zimbabwe, we can beat any political party hands down. We are the Goliath of Zimbabwean politics; absolutely no doubt about that!" Gutu said.
Biti said he viewed Mujuru as a "friend and not foe".
"It is those that have an unbridled ambition to rule, who think they have a God given right to take over from Mugabe," he said.
"We do not view PF as a threat to us. An enemy to our enemy is a friend to us. Mujuru is an enemy to Mugabe and Zanu PF. It is those that are drunk with the urge to rule who are sweating," Biti said.
"We have said we will work with all right thinking political formations and PF is one of them".
Brutally stampeded out of the ruling party at the tail end of 2014, ahead of the Zanu PF congress Mujuru has played her cards close to her chest thus far - letting her lieutenants including another liberation stalwart and ex-ruling party propaganda chief Gumbo do the talking.
Gumbo said the party's constitution was "almost complete".
"But we are not going to have the complete constitution because input is still coming from the provinces," he said.
"We have requested that they continue to bring their input. Another thing is it has to be ratified by congress but we will have a working document that will regulate our members as we go to the inaugural congress."
Despite her expulsion from the ruling party, Mujuru has remained popular amid reports serving MPs were preparing to jump ship ahead of a watershed poll in 2018.